bytebuster | Дописи з міткою stackexchange

А ну, цікаво, комусь сподобається? :-)

Q: “Богове”, “синове” як називний відмінок множини. Що за форма?

Гомер. Іліада. Переклад Бориса Тена - Борис Тен (переклад з давньогрецької), 1978 - Харків: Фоліо, 2006. - 416 с.:

290] Хай списоборцем його вічносущі богове створили,
291] Та чи на те, щоб усіх він поганими лаяв словами?»

Потім:

281] Щоб у перших рядах і в останніх синове ахеїв
282] Слово розчути могли і слушну пораду збагнути.

Спробував декілька запитів у ґуґлі, але не можу знайти нічого притомного.

Можете, будь ласка, пояснити, що це за така форма називного відмінку у множині, яка виглядає як кличний?

Наші іменники, створені волею Зевса і Гери,
Різними суфіксами прикрашає народ працелюбний;
Ніби віночок вдягає на слово, щоб слово блищало,
Сяяло так, щоб побачили боги, що є на Говерлі.

Йменники, що позначають слова чоловічого роду,
І що знаходяться у множині називного відмінку —
Як-то: "сино́ве, брато́ве, пано́ве, кумо́ве, свато́ве" —
Можуть отримувать суфікси -ов-, зокрема, в діалектах.

Варто зазначити, цей феномен є відомим науці
І, зокрема, розглядався Степаном Бевзенком.
Що проспівав у своїй видатній науковій роботі ⁽¹⁾
Пісню і гімн і потужну осанну цьому феномену:

Множина
Із діалектних форм наз. відм. множини вкажемо на поширені, хоч і обмежено, в карпатських і в ряді інших південно-західних говорів форми іменників чоловічого роду з флексією -ове, перенесеної з колишніх -й- основ: сино́ве, брато́ве, пано́ве, кумо́ве, свато́ве, сус'ідове та ін.; вірло́ве (орли), вітро́ве, дошчо́ве та ін.

⁽¹⁾ Бевзенко С.П. «Українська діалектологія» (стор. 102)

Why doesn't South Korea give up its claim on North Korea?

By now it's completely obvious that the Korean peninsula won't be reuniting any time soon. It's also quite likely that the South wouldn't want a full reunification anyway given the enormous economic differences between the two countries.

So why won't South Korea officially abandon their claim to the North of the peninsula? What benefit is there in maintaining the charade?

Simply because abandoning territorial claims will do nothing:

It will neither eliminate the military threat of the "North" Korea, nor would it relax the tensions.
It requires enormous amounts of legal work, including adopting amendments to the Constitution of Korea.

This is why:

Both governments claimed sovereignty over the whole Korea, however in a different manner:
- Constitution of Korea (Article 3) claims that Republic of Korea has sovereignty over entire Korean Peninsula;
- Constitution of "North" Korea (Article 1) claims sovereignty over all Korean people. Article 2 talks about "the liberation of the homeland" (obviously, including the Southern Koreans) from "imperialist aggressors".
There is no peace treaty signed yet (the 1953 Agreement deals with armistice only);
Retracting the territorial claims can be done on a mutual basis, probably as a part of Peace Treaty, when both sides to retract their claims;
There are reasons to think that the "North" Korea is not going to keep with its promise, should any be given.
Most likely, adopting amendments to the cornerstone articles of the Constitution would require conducting a National referendum and convincing the majority of the citizens. We could safely assume that there is a powerful lobby against that: the Wikipedia article for Korean reunification contains some introductory links that indicate controversy in public opinion.

Q: Candy Crush Soda Saga: Best levels to complete quests

For example, the "Go Fish" quest requires you to match two fish together, a certain number of times.

I've played levels where there are fish generators next to each other, and a lot of the work of finishing the level is matching the fish together to make "triple fish". These levels would be ideal for this quest, but I can't remember which ones they were.

Does anyone know which levels I mean? And do you know any other levels that are very well suited to particular quests?

For example, level 8 is well suited to the "color collecting" quests that require you to match eg 1000 orange candies, since there's a lot of combos on the level and it's quick and easy to complete.

_{Image courtesy of Wikia}

_{Image courtesy of Wikia}

I use #106 as an ultimate level for completing quests (all various ones).
Whenever I get bored with it, I switch to #73.

Level #106 meets all requirements for completing quests:

It is not trivial (e.g., not very "early" level);
It is easy to win; from personal experience, my success ratio is about 75% on this level, so I can not only complete quests from the right menu (which are awarded even if you die), but also the quests from the left panel (which are only awarded if you win);
It is long enough (35 moves), which allows me clear up the space in e.g. 20-25 moves and have free moves for fancy stuff like double fish (which does little but is needed for quests);
It is easy to get at least 2 stars on it (for "blue alien" star quests);
It quickly opens a free open space that allows me create lots of 5-bar and 6-bar color candies. If you are lucky enough, you can trigger the "chain reaction" of re-coloring 6-bar candies that would let you get a score of 1,000,000, with the corresponding amount of various fancy candies generated (check the high scores table, the #1 is me).

Level #73 is very close to #106, but it is harder to win (a "Samurai" hard level). Same "free the bears", same 35 moves.

// А ось дивіться, як розкладено по поличках! Я у захваті від того, як люди вміють лаконічно висловлюватися. Мені б так сі навчити…
Q: Why is communism considered as evil (like fascism and nazism) in the United States?

A: Fundamental to communist ideology is the common ownership of the means of production and abolishment of social classes and social hierarchy. In practice, that means no (or very few) private property rights, and forced redistribution of wealth from those who are most able to produce to those who are less able or unwilling to do so.

Private property and the exclusive access to the fruits of one's own labor are fundamental human rights under natural law. In order for communism to be moral, it requires everyone to voluntarily cooperate with each other towards a common goal. Unfortunately, people do not work this way. They are different in their ambitions, in their capabilities, and in their values. These differences cause different outcomes, cause some to be more successful than others, and even cause differences by which success is measured in the first place. But communism requires collectivism in order to work. Communism must eliminate those variations of the individual in order to harmonize with the collective good. This is absolutely counterintuitive to everything about human nature.

In order to realize communist goals, private property and the individual's right to their own labor must be seized from them for the sake of the collective. And because this is antithetical to individual freedom, communist governments must also work to eliminate dissent. Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.

In light of the authoritarian oppression of every communist regime in the history of ever, there are those who still make the argument that the idea of communism is good; it's just been "done wrong" by every communist state that has attempted it. However, this is not true. Communism is a fundamentally flawed ideology at its core. Its goals are attractive in principle, but completely unworkable in practice.

Communist governments must necessarily use coercion to achieve the social harmony they promise, depriving the individual of the right to choose their own destiny -- especially if those choices lead to better outcomes for them than for others. This is why every communist state has been a totalitarian nightmare replete with rampant and gross human rights violations. That is the inevitable destiny of any communist regime because it is utterly and completely incompatible with individual freedom and conscience.

Q: Why did the US force Russia Today to register as a foreign agent? How does it benefit the US?

Why did the US force Russia Today to register as a foreign agent?

It seems like the US government are shooting themselves in the foot — this gives Russia an excellent excuse to force Voice of America and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty to register as a foreign agent, which can hardly surprise the US. One is a Russian government funded news outlet operating in the US (and elsewhere), the other is a US government funded news outlet operating in Russia (and elsewhere). It's very easy for Russian propaganda to declare the two equivalent, no matter whether or not this is accurate when one looks at the detail.

What does the US gain by forcing RT to register as a foreign agent?

// Трошки довга відповідь вийшла, але вже як є. Піди за посиланням і плюсіка мені постав, не жаднічай!

( Read more... )

Q: Which disadvantages for a region does it have declaring the independence from its country if the rest of the world doesnt recognize it?

// Ну як діти малі, чесне слово, усе доводиться їм розжовувати. :-) Але приємно, що Accepted answer через хвилину після написання, я навіть не всю граматику вичитав, а ОП вже прийняв. Приємно.
І ти тоже, %USERNAME%, піди хоч плюсіка мені постав за відповідь, не будь жадіною! :-)

Today Catalonia declared the independence from Spain.

The European Union and United States stated they only will treat with Spain, meaning they do not recognize Catalonia as a country.

Which disadvantages does this have aside they can't negociate directly with the United States and countries of the European Union? How does this affect for example, exports and imports from United States and the European Union to the region of Catalonia?

TL;DR: The lack of recognition leads to a "corruption tax" paid by the citizens of an unrecognized territory. That's why the recognition is the key factor for any region.

( Read more... )

Q: Чи є питомими подвійні слова “жив-був”, “хороший-прехороший” тощо?

У «Вечірній казці діда Панаса» актор Петро Вескляров починає казку так:

В одному лісі жили собі та були собі Їжак із Їжачихою — YouTube відео

Той же актор Вескляров наприкінці передачі часто прощався з глядачами так:

Нехай вам присняться хороші-прехороші, солодкі-пресолодкі сни — YouTube відео

Відомо, що таке подвоєння часто вживається у російській: усі оці жить-поживать, жив-здоров, путь-дорожка, такой-сякой і багато інших. Тому виникає підозра, чи не є таке подвоєння наслідком порівняно недавнього негативного впливу іноземної мови.

Запитання полягає у тому, наскільки питомим є подібне подвоєння саме для української мови?
Чесно кажучи, я навіть ключових слів не можу придумати, щоб поґуґлити наукові джерела.

В відповідь від колеги

robofob, якого я щиро вітаю з першою відповіддю:

Це асиндетони — безсполучникове поєднання слів (іменників, прикметників, дієслів, займенників, прислівників): думи-бджоли, гори-хвилі, зорі-вівці, мед-вино, жито-пшениця, рута-м’ята, нічка-петрівочка, журба-горе, турки-яничари, Січ-мати, місяць-підкова, ворожка-ніч, криниці-ночі, терни-байраки, горе-біда; чужа-чужанина, піший-піхотинець; шити-білити, плакала-ридала; сякі-такі, сього-того; тяжко-важко, косо-криво
(Зубков, "Українська мова: Універсальний довідник", Х., 2006, с. 139).

Просто на випадок, якщо ви ще не знали.

Q: What are the main differences between the Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana branches of Buddhism?

This question, indeed, requires a whole book in order to be answered completely. Let me address only Theravada and Mahayana here.

In two words:

The most important aspect is that Theravada is focused on your own liberation from suffering, while Mahayana is targeted to all sentient creatures;
There are many consequences here:
- Theravada assumes that you have to practice for yourself, while others can only suggest you. Mahayana says that you can (and have to) share your experience and accomplishments with others, thus making followers for yourself;
- Theravada suggests to seek enlightenment for yourself first; Mahayana is up to delaying breaking off Samsara in order to help others;
- Theravada practices are mostly silent and very personal while in Mahayana it is more often "wrapped" in some collective rituals like chanting;
In Theravada, the final goal for a Bodhisattva is nirvana. In Mahayana, prominence is important by itself;
Each teaching is more or less localized, e.g. at a certain country/territory there's usually only one;
If you'd like to read scriptures in original language, you should be aware that Theravada is written in Pali (Pali Cannon) while Mahayana is written in Sanskrit (Sutras);

Of course, there are also big differences in texts, ritual, etiquette, and so on.

This Comparative Study between two traditions provide with greater details.

// Давно я не брав в руки шашку і не ганяв qassab'ів… :-)
Q: Is the use of “Kiev” (or other Russian-based spelling) considered offensive in Ukraine?

Someone edited my question, which originally used "Kiev" to mean the capital of Ukraine, but edited into "Kyiv". I just briefly googled it and found that "Kiev" is a Russian word while "Kyiv" is a Ukrainian one.

I wonder if it is considered offensive, or otherwise not welcomed among Ukrainians.

I feel that people don't care about my pronunciation, so the issue would be only in the written context (e.g. chat with AirBnB hosts, ask help for a stranger on a smartphone, etc...).

So, is it offensive for locals? Or approximately how many people (in percentage) care about it?

You seem to be one of those who have approved the edit, so I guess (correct me if I'm wrong) this question's goal is primarily to confirm your original thought.

Also, "is it offensive?" seems to be a subjective term that can't be measured. I would say yes, someone else would say no, and we end up in a battle "word against word". So let me focus of facts only.

Official. According to UNGEGN (United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names), the only possible English-language transliteration is "Kyiv".
The same source confirms the proper spelling for Donets'k, Luhans'k, Kharkiv, and several others.

Other languages. Besides "Kiev", there are other spellings, including "Kiew", "Kijow" and even 《基辅》, pronounced — believe it or not — [ji-fu].

People's perception. Indeed, spelling "Kiev" is a direct transliteration of "Киев", the Russian word for Kyiv, and many Ukrainians (not all, however) associate this with the Russian occupation that happened in the past and the armed invasion and partial occupation that occurs at the moment.

Many Russian officials also insist on using an incorrect spelling "the Ukraine", see link below. This, multiplied to the fact that many Ukrainians speak bad English or don't simply care (like JonathanReez♦'s answer suggests), has some effect.

The following photo shows the very process of russification. "Little green men" in unmarked uniforms on a truck (right) "enforce the Russian spelling" on a road sign at the entry to the occupied Donets'k city by removing the "soft sign" so that «ДОНЕЦЬК» became «ДОНЕЦК».

Most obviously, this makes people who disagree with "Russian-styled" toponyms in Ukraine. Like myself.

More to go. Having several names for toponyms (for various historic reasons) happens in other countries, too: Burma/Myanmar, Mumbai/Bombay, Munich/München, Beijing/Peking, Saigon/Ho Chi Minh City, Bangkok/Krungthep Mahanakhon, Falkland/Malvin Islands, to name a few.

A Traveler's Rule of Thumb (mind you, we are at Travel.SE). A traveler should always consider the historical and cultural aspects in order to avoid being perceived as an ignorant person (and, in corner cases, as an enemy agent).

However, there is no problem if a foreigner uses Russian as their way of communication. Check this question for further details: What is the main spoken language in Kiev: Ukrainian or Russian?

Q: Why do restaurants and cafes in Ukraine make a transaction on each food separately?

I'm now in Kiev and found that some restaurants and cafes make a transaction on each plate separately.

For example, yesterday I ordered a slice of napoleon and a cup of hot chocolate. When I paid by my credit card, the waiter made me type in PIN two times, by separating the transaction.

One time I asked the waiter why she must make them separate, but she answered she doesn't know. Not all restaurants and cafes follow this habit so I feel it is not anything related to the law. But then why do many restaurants and cafes make me pay for each plate separately?

Also, can I ask the waiter to put the whole transaction together (but in Kiev about half waiters don't speak English)?

This is how they avoid taxes.

( Read more... )

// Ех, давно я не брав в руки шашку…
Нагадую, треба піти по першій ссилочці і поплюсувати запитання і ті відповіді, які сподобалися. А то поки прямим текстом не напишеш, ніхто не здогадається. :-)

Q: Why are anti-independence Catalans so silent?

The polls I have seen showcase that at least 40%, perhaps a bit more, of the Catalan population oppose independence.

[…]

But where are the anti-independence foreigners joined by anti-independence Catalans? Why are they not being heard? 40% is a huge number. Why is their opinion not represented?

You needn't a political movement to force your country's police do their job

Apologies for a bit of bold title (in both senses), but this is precisely the answer.

In most national-liberation movements, the "pro-" secession faction is more active than their opponents. That's because the separatists need changes, while their opponents prefer to keep things the way how they are. In other words, if someone is "anti-"secession, they almost automatically become "pro-" the existing order:

Borders.
Type of government.
Country's affiliations and memberships (cf. the EU).
Law and Order.

Which is precisely the job of the National police, National Security service, etc.

Unless the anti-secession Catalans suspect their police of neglecting its duties, there's no need to protest. There are numerous reports that the Spanish police was not passive recently.

Also, the impression of "so silent" can be made because foreigners often look at the mass protests, street violence, and similar events. However, there are several political parties in Parliament of Catalonia who continue political struggle.
For one, "Citizens" is known for its opposition to Catalonian nationalism and the secession.
The above would also answer the question, "Why is their opinion not represented?" — in fact, they are represented.

З'явився бот, що експортує запитання/відповіді з UkrSE до Facebook

// Автор не я, тому зауваження і коментарі пишіть авторові на Ukrainian.Meta.StackExchange (посилання вище)

Це зроблено для того, щоб якось популяризувати сайт серед тих, хто не хоче вилазити з Facebook'у. За'follow'ивши відповідну фейсбук-сторінку (кнопка «Стежити» на ній (або «Follow» у англійській версії)), користувач зможе отримувати сповіщення про нові запитання/відповіді на сайті у свою стрічку новин у Фейсбуці.

Наразі адреса фейсбучної сторінки така: https://www.facebook.com/Ukrainian-Stack-Exchange-811367038989344/. Сторінка не призначена для того, щоби прямо на ній запитувати/відповідати (додавання дописів на ній звичайними користувачами взагалі вимкнено), а лише для того, щоб «перенаправляти» відвідувачів (що чимось зацікавилися) сюди.

Кожне запитання на сайті автоматично перетворюється на допис на відповідній сторінці у Facebook, а кожна відповідь — у коментар до нього. При оновленні (редагуванні) запитання/відповіді допис/коментар автоматично оновлюється. Можливо, це пізніше призводитиме до завеликої кількості сповіщень у фейсбук-стрічці — над цим треба подумати: можливо, боту слід перестати реагувати на кожне редагування або зробити кілька окремих сторінок із різною частотою оновлень (одна — про будь-які зміни, інша — про нові відповіді і запитання, третя — лише про нові запитання).

Чого я від вас хочу:

Популяризуйте фейсбук-сторінку, якщо маєте бажання (like'айте, поширюйте тощо).
Чи маєте якісь побажання щодо змін у боті/сторінці?

Ви ще користуєтеся терористичним Каспєрським? Тоді ось вам.
До речі, наброс відбувається успішно, за 14 годин — ~~близько 4,000~~ вже 4,600 переглядів. Задоволений собою.

Q: Is Kaspersky Lab a military unit?

In this article, McClatchy DC bureau claims that one of the certificates the Kaspersky Lab received from Russian FSB/KGB reveals that the entire Kaspersky Lab joint-stock company is actually a FSB military unit #43753.

Kaspersky Lab is a company that develops antivirus software, available worldwide at retail and online shops.

So, the question: Is Kaspersky Lab a military unit?

// Це усе стосується питання про називання речей своїми іменами. Істинно кажу вам: усе інше — хуйня. Важливо лише називання речей своїми іменами.
Нє, брешу. Ще одна не-хуйня — це ваші плюсіки. Голосуйте, це дійсно, важливо.

Q: Was Russia really able to solve its 'Ukraine problem' by invasion?

As far as I knew, Russia invaded Ukraine because Ukraine wanted to join the West.

Why was joining in NATO by Ukraine was a problem? Coz, Russia wanted to maintain a buffer zone between NATO and its border (e.g. Belarus, Finland, Georgia).

Why does Russia want a buffer zone? Coz, that would give them a military advantage over NATO in the case of a NATO invasion.

Nonetheless, Ukraine is moving forward with its plan to join NATO.

My question is, since, Ukraine's NATO membership is almost inevitable, wasn't invasion of Ukraine a miscalculation and waste of time by Russia?

Was Russia really able to solve its 'Ukraine' problem by invasion?
wasn't invasion of Ukraine a miscalculation and waste of time by Russia?

Yes, there was a good evidence that Russia was able to stop Ukraine by invading it, just like Russia has successfully prevented Georgia's Eurointegration by armed invasion to Georgia in 2008, with no consequences for the Russia itself.
No, not waste of time. Stopping Ukraine's Eurointegration was Russia's last chance to avoid its own fall, both as an empire and as the unite state. They understood it very well, and they did everything to keep their own country from collapsing.
Yes, they miscalculated about the world's response on their actions this time.

Before expanding on the above, let me first say that some key points from the referenced video are not very accurate. Not that I'm saying it is deliberately false, but it is misleading as it forms a wrong cause-and-effect picture in the minds of its audience.

For example, Al Jazeera's video puts presidential elections (7-June-2014) before the Russia's armed invasion to Crimea (began on 20-Feb-2014, even according to Russia's official propaganda). This may make someone think that removal Yanukovich may be the cause to Russia's armed invasion to Crimea, but it was the opposite.

Russia's medal for invading Crimea that clearly says that the Russia's armed invasion to Crimea started on 20.02.2014 when the marionette president Yanukovich still remained in power (Yanukovich fled Ukraine two days later, on 22-Feb-2014).

Another wrong statement is that Ukraine is "split" between Russian and Ukrainian nationals. This has been debunked many times, incl. this site, so let me not reiterate this.

There are several other inaccuracies, too. Again, I don't say that Al Jazeera is lying, but one should always keep in mind such nuances before forming their understanding about what's going on.

( Read more... )

Ну скажіть, авжеж я умнічка? :-)

Q: What is the Mongolian vowel separator for?

I've heard of the Mongolian vowel separator from programmers, who regard it as an interesting quirk in Unicode. When I google for it, most of the hits are from those revelling in its geekiness.

But as someone dabbling a bit in Mongolian, I'd like to know: What is it used for?

The formal description has been already given in the excellent @ColinFine's answer. Let me give a different description in "layman terms".

Mongolian characters usually have four distinct forms: isolate, initial, medial, and final.
Vowels A and E have exactly the same glyphs in their final form.
Here are the four forms for A and E, correspondingly.
Note, both have two versions of final glyphs:

Mongolian vowels A and E

Although choosing between A or E can be concluded from the the syntax (A for masculine grammatic gender while E is for feminine), there can be semantic difference depending on the final form (stroke up or stroke down).

For example:

qara [qara] (to look), stroke up;
qar+a [qar+a] (black), stroke down;

( Read more... )

Бо дуже часто неможливо відрізнити оголтєлу трампаньєтку від оголтєлого рашиста.

Ну ось зацініть. І знайдіть 10 відмінностей від риторики типового московського рашиста.
У цьому дописі міститься повний комплект рашистських logical fallacies — від «єслі нє путєн, то кот» до перескакування на марксизм-нацизм і прочій -ізм у запитанні, яке зовсім не пов'язані з темою, про яку запитували:
What is Trump's plan to get the United States out of trillions in debt?
Відповідь трампаньєткі видалено, але якщо маєте достатньо рєпи на Політиці.SE, то можете читати.

Відповідав тут на запитання:
Q: Does Arrow's Theorem invalidate an alternate voting system?

Imagine this voting algorithm: Each voter ranks their choices. Then, the 1st choice votes are tallied, and the one with the lowest score removed from the running. Those who have the removed contender have their rankings shifted up one, i.e. their second choice is now considered their first choice. Everybody else keeps their rankings.

How does Arrow's Theorem invalidate this? It seems to satisfy all four conditions, but the theorem shows it can't. Which condition does this not meet, and why?

A: The voting system you describe is called Single transferrable vote (STV).

Arrow's theorem does not discuss STV specifically. Instead, it states that no electoral system exist that satisfies a certain number of criteria at once.

One of these criteria is monotonicity, and there are studies that conclude STV is non-monotonic.

І тут у коментарях підкинули ахуєнчік. Інтерактивна гра, яка показує результати голосування за різними виборчими системами.
Корочє, я кілька годин грався. Не клікайте, «єслі вам дороґ ваш рассудок і дажє жізнь, дєржитєсь подальше від торфяних болот». ©
Я попередив. :)

Хвалюся. Два дні — два золоті бейджі на StackExchange: на Лінгвістиці і на Політиці. Що автоматично збільшує мої шанси на шапку модератора під час наступних виборів. На обох підсайтах беджі „Steward“ є лише у мене (причому на Лінгвістиці це вже другий).

Щось не дуже «пішла» рубрика, менше 25 переходів по кожній статті. Напевне, доведеться скасовувати :-(

Чи є різниця між “відновний ” і “відновлювальний”?

Натикнувся на статтю, в якій згадується «реабілітаційно-відновний спортивний центр у Дніпрі планують будувати…»

Мені це слово здалося незвичним.

Словники мають як статтю відновний, так і відновлювальний, з повністю однаковою семантикою:

Стосовний до відновлення.

Чи є між цими словами якась різниця? Цікавить, у першу чергу, контекст медичної галузі, але і дізнатися про інші контексти також було б цікаво.

Чи потрібна кома після “тобто”?

Дивлюсь у СУМ і бачу:

Без коми після "тобто":

Чернишеві на час артпідготовки випало бути старшим, тобто командувати з'єднаним вогнем усіх трьох мінрот
Ми зустрілися з ним на березі Азовського моря — поблизу Матроської слобідки під Маріуполем, тобто нинішнім містом Жданов
Тобто вичавлювання виробів з металу, який під дією високого тиску стає м'яким

З комою після "тобто":

Наказую… Тобто, щиро прошу всіх присутніх з'їсти по пів-яблука номер один і при цьому дивитись на мене...
Тобто, як відвезти?

Про блоґ

...Вона блює і співає

Посилання

StackExchange

RSS

А ще…

Підписатися на RSS

Розгорнути cut

Navigation

Сторінку створено Вівторок, 17 Червень 2025 18:27

Травень 2025

П	В	С	Ч	П	С	Н
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Створено з Dreamwidth Studios

За стиль дякувати

Основний стиль: Librarian's Dream by branchandroot
Тема: A Night In by timeasmymeasure

...Вона блює і співає

Колись, ще до війни, це був журнал про айтішні приколи, цицьки і котиків…

Дописи з міткою stackexchange

Знаймо українську — “Богове”, “синове” як називний відмінок множини. Що за форма?

Why doesn't South Korea give up its claim on North Korea?

Candy Crush Soda Saga: Best levels to complete quests

Why is communism considered as evil (like fascism and nazism) in the United States?

Why did the US force Russia Today to register as a foreign agent? How does it benefit the US?

Which disadvantages for a region if the rest of the world doesnt recognize it?

Чи є питомими подвійні слова “жив-був”, “хороший-прехороший” тощо?

What are the main differences between the Theravada, Mahayana and Vajrayana branches of Buddhism?

Is the use of “Kiev” (or other Russian-based spelling) considered offensive in Ukraine?

Чому кафе розділило мій рахунок на два чеки?

This is how they avoid taxes.

Why are anti-independence Catalans so silent?

You needn't a political movement to force your country's police do their job

З'явився бот, що експортує запитання/відповіді з UkrSE до Facebook

Is Kaspersky Lab a military unit?

Was Russia really able to solve its 'Ukraine problem' by invasion?

Вчимо монгольську (жартую)

Напевне, головна причина, чому мені не подобаються оголтєлиє трампаньєткі

Про виборчі системи

Кармадрочєрства пост

Знаймо українську — Чи є різниця між “відновний ” і “відновлювальний”?

Знаймо українську — Чи потрібна кома після “тобто”?

Про блоґ

Посилання

RSS

Популярні мітки

А ще…

Розгорнути cut

Navigation

Травень 2025

За стиль дякувати